Welcome to the Dissent
Welcome to the Dissent
This is not an echo chamber.
This is a testing ground.
Welcome to a space where the dominant paradigm is not dismissed, but rigorously stress-tested. Here, consensus is not the goal—evidence is.
This blog operates under a simple, yet radical, principle: ideas must stand or fall on their own merits, not on the credentials of who presents them or the popularity of what they challenge. That is why I write under a pseudonym. To force the conversation to focus on the content of the argument, not the curriculum of the arguer.
What You Will Find Here:
In-Depth Articles:
Lengthy, detailed analyses on the debate between Intelligent Design and Neo-Darwinian evolution, written for those who find Reddit's character limit insufficient for such complexity.Philosophical Rigor:
A commitment to clear definitions, logical consistency, and separating scientific evidence from philosophical naturalism.A Focus on Inference:
Arguments that explore why Intelligent Design may not just be a possibility, but the best inference from the empirical data we have.
My Commitment:
I am here to engage with the evidence, double-time. I welcome sincere, substantive objections from all corners. In fact, I seek them out. As a dissenter, my own views are sharpened and refined against strong counter-arguments. If you have a better explanation, let's hear it. If you find a flaw in my reasoning, point it out.
This blog is an extension of the dialogue. It is a place to think deeply, question boldly, and follow the evidence wherever it leads—even if it leads away from the comfort of the consensus.
"A place where consensus goes on vacation and evidence is put to work double-time."
— El-Temur, 2025
Explore the articles, scrutinize the arguments, and join the dialogue.
The evidence is waiting.